Special Rights For Specific Religious Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
929
Cite

Furthermore, the policy seems to put a burden on the hospital to help provide those services, which seems to put an undue burden on the hospital. Writing policies that guaranteed access would be permitted, but did not in any way guarantee facilitation of that access would seem to be a better policy. One of the least understood religious groups in the United States is the Church of Scientology. There is a strong belief that members of this religious group are adverse to modern medical care, a belief that I shared before researching their organization. However, from the information that I could find, Scientologists are not opposed to modern medicine. On the contrary, the Church of Scientology has an official policy of not being involved in either medical diagnosis or treatment of medical illnesses. They believe that underlying illness inhibits a person's spiritual journey, so that they encourage members to seek treatment for any underlying illnesses. This treatment can include medications as well as other treatments that are considered medically necessary. Moreover, this belief in modern medicine extends to mental illness or cognitive deficits, contrary to rumors that Scientologists do not believe in mental health diagnosis (See generally, Church of Scientology, 2012).

Because Scientologists are open to modern medical care, their religious preferences really do not appear as if they would impact access to medical services. In fact, even after careful consideration, I really cannot see how their religion would have...

...

The only real concern is being respectful of individual religious issues and concerns and not allowing my preconceived notions of their religion to impact how I treat the patient. Prior to learning about Scientology I would have made assumptions about patients that may have impacted how I would have tried to provide services to patients who practiced that religion, limiting their access to care through my own misunderstanding of their religion.
The main lesson that I learned from this project was that I had preconceived notions about at least one religious group. Because of the press surrounding Jett Travolta's death, I assumed that Scientologists were opposed to modern medical care, which was what was reported at that time. Only upon engaging in this research did I find out otherwise. It made me aware that I should not make any assumptions about a person's religious beliefs and how they will impact healthcare decisions when approaching patients, but ask them about it instead.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Church of Scientology. (2012). Do Scientologists use medical doctors? Retrieved March 6,

2012 from Scientology Newsroom website: http://www.scientologynews.org/faq/do-scientologists-use-medical-doctors.html

Hmong shamans help at Valley hospitals. (2009, November 10). Retrieved March 5, 2012 from Fresno Bee website: http://www.fresnobee.com/2009/10/10/1669868/hmong-shamans-help-at-valley-hospitals.html


Cite this Document:

"Special Rights For Specific Religious" (2012, March 05) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/special-rights-for-specific-religious-54763

"Special Rights For Specific Religious" 05 March 2012. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/special-rights-for-specific-religious-54763>

"Special Rights For Specific Religious", 05 March 2012, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/special-rights-for-specific-religious-54763

Related Documents

Special Interest Groups and Politics Interest Groups and Politics Special interest groups are organizations whose members are organized, mobilized and share specific agendas and objectives (Dincer, 2012). They work to gain favor with politicians and legislative officials in order to influence governmental policy. Interest groups are very common in the United States (Thurber, 2010). They operate very differently from political parties that ultimately try to gain control of the government (Naoi &

This modification of the Civil Rights Act failed to define what was meant by "financially detrimental." This issue was left for the courts to decide and there was wide variability in case law. In 1977, Title VII was modified to include widespread employer exemption, even in cases where the cost was minimal or caused little difficult to the employer (Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, n.d.). This modification shifted the balance

According to Prchal, "As the nineteenth century became the twentieth, the United States experienced an unprecedented surge in immigration. Some 3.8 million Italians, 3.4 million Slavs, and 1.8 million Russian and Eastern European Jews -- along with still more from other ethnic groups -- entered the country between 1899 and 1924" (at 189). These enormous numbers of newcomers to the country concerned those who were already here, particularly most

Various types of Non-Government Organizations can play an important role in the protection of human rights. These organizations are impartial and are unrelated to any political or industrial agenda. China has always been wary of outer interference protecting their sovereignty at all costs thus it must come from inside china the realization that the Chinese people can no longer bear the lack of political freedom. The educated people are increasingly

Religion in Public Schools: Religious Fundamentalists vs. Atheists The relevance of raising children with an insistence on the development of a high moral character cannot be overstated. Essentially, individuals raised with a well founded moral character have the ability to clearly distinguish between bad/unacceptable behavior and good/acceptable behavior. With this in mind, it is understandable that parents usually prefer to have their children undertake their education in an enabling environment that

Human Rights The closest thing to a universally-accepted definition of human rights comes from the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). That body's definition is founded on the principle that human rights are inalienable and universal. That is, they apply to all human beings and that all are entitled to these rights without discrimination. The UN definition also holds that human rights are "interrelated, interdependent and indivisible" (OHCHR, 2016).