Civil Rights: The Ricci V. Destefano Case Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
817
Cite

Civil Rights: The Ricci v. DeStefano case is a U.S. Supreme Court case that was decided in June, 2009 and raises concerns regarding the steps employers may take in situations where the avoidance of discrimination against one group may imply discrimination against another group. This case has attracted huge public concern that has resulted in various arguments that have been raised either in support or opposition of the Supreme Court's decision on this case. In one section, the decision by the Supreme Court in Ricci v. DeStefano is considered as very good news since it clearly and decisively demonstrated that the employment law only rarely allows quotas to solve racial imbalance. Therefore, the Supreme Court was implying that most racial preferences were mainly covered in dishonesty and secrecy. On the contrary, the court's decision in this case is viewed as a major blow to diversity in the United States workplace.

The origin of this case can be traced back to 2003 when the City of New Haven, Connecticut administered written tests in attempts to find employee for the vacant captain and lieutenant positions in its Fire Department. The tests were to contribute to 60% of the eventual evaluation of a candidate's ability to effectively serve as a lieutenant or captain....

...

The remaining percentage of a person's assessment was made up of an oral examination testing the ability of the candidate to lead others in emergency situations (McConnell & Pierre par, 8). During the analysis of the results of the written tests, New Haven officials discovered that the pass rate for black candidates was nearly half the pass rate for white candidates. Based on the requirements by New Haven's City Charter, the highest scoring black candidates for the lieutenant and captain positions were thirteenth and fifteenth respectively.
The issue was later referred to the New Haven's Civil Service Board, which was eventually deadlocked on whether to certify depending on the test results after hearing evidence about the test results. The deadlock resulted in the inability of the board to certify any list of eligible candidates. As eligible candidates for immediate promotion, Frank Ricci and other firefighters filed a lawsuit against John DeStefano, New Haven's City major, and other city officials. The case was based on Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act for alleged violation of the clause on Equal Protection.

As the Supreme Court provided certiorari on the consolidated cases at the beginning of 2009, the Ricci v. DeStefano case showed…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited:

McConnell, James, and Lucienne Pierre. "Ricci v. DeStefano (07-1428); Ricci v. DeStefano (08-328)." Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School, n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2012. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/07-1428>.

THERNSTROM, ABIGAIL. "The Supreme Court Says No To Quotas." The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company, Inc., n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2012. <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124640586803076705.html>.


Cite this Document:

"Civil Rights The Ricci V Destefano Case" (2012, October 27) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/civil-rights-the-ricci-v-destefano-case-76155

"Civil Rights The Ricci V Destefano Case" 27 October 2012. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/civil-rights-the-ricci-v-destefano-case-76155>

"Civil Rights The Ricci V Destefano Case", 27 October 2012, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/civil-rights-the-ricci-v-destefano-case-76155

Related Documents

Employers are not permitted to create requirements for jobs that have a disparate impact upon the ethnic composition of the workforce, if such requirements are not necessary for the job. But "once a plaintiff has established a prima facie case of disparate impact, the employer may defend by demonstrating that its policy or practice is job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity." Furthermore, "the City's

New Haven Firefighters The Supreme Court case of Ricci v. DeStefano was heard in April of 2009, and the Court's decision was issued in favor of the plaintiffs on 29 June, 2009. The plaintiffs here, Ricci et al., were nineteen firefighters from New Haven, Connecticut who had sued the administration of New Haven mayor John DeStefano over the decision to disregard results from a written examination given for promotion within the

Discrimination and Affirmative Action "Firefighting is a skilled job where all of the skills learned are on the job… It's a really good job, and it's been racially exclusive in most of our major cities…" (John Payton, NAACP) (Liptak, 2009, The New York Times) Workplace issues that revolve around racial fairness and racial justice typically are highly charged with passion and contentiousness. The now notorious case of the Caucasian firefighters in New

The way that this relates to the work place, is that any kind of slight variation in the quota system can open the flood gates for these kinds of suits to occur. Then, when the court does not provide consistency in their rulings it creates even more confusion. When you look beyond the quota system, it is clear that this basic principal, of taking something away from one group and