Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Microsoft Antitrust Case
Antitrust Practices and Market Power
Antitrust case: 2001 antitrust Microsoft settlement
Microsoft Windows is such a ubiquitous piece of software, it is virtually impossible to imagine using a computer without it. Even though many people dislike the system, to function in contemporary life requires most students and workers to be familiar with the product. This lack of de facto choice has led Microsoft to become the subject of numerous antitrust lawsuits, the longest and most extensive of which involved its built-in Internet browser, Internet Explorer. The government alleged that by bundling IE into Microsoft Windows, it subjected other browsers to unfair competitive practices and limited consumer choice. During the lawsuit: Microsoft contended "that it, and it alone, should be the arbiter of what new software is bundled into its Windows operating system, the equivalent of the central nervous system on 90% of personal computers. Besides, Microsoft contends, its Internet browser is not a separate product, as the Government asserts, but an 'integrated feature' of Windows" (Lohr 1998, Ruling on Microsoft).
The government's suit applied the Sherman Antitrust Act "protecting consumer choice and economic competition from...
v. Microsoft). At the time, in defense of its contention that Microsoft unfairly 'bundled' services to make it difficult for users to choose other browsers the government stated: "Microsoft's operating system, the central nervous system of a computer, has changed dramatically, adding dozens of new features over the years to make computers easier to use. All Windows' features, from point-and-click icons to software for sending faxes from a personal computer, were once sold as separate products" (Lohr 1998, U.S. v. Microsoft). The bundling reduced competitive practices while Microsoft said that designing its operating system as it did was its right as a company.
In the eventual settlement between the government and Microsoft, Microsoft had to share information with third parties to enable them to more easily create browsers that would be just as compatible with Windows as Internet Explorer. "The DOJ emphasized the goal of the settlement was to ensure a competitive environment for so-called middleware applications, such as Web browsers and media players, that could help erode the Windows monopoly" (Romano 2007). In terms of the efficacy of the 2001 settlement, the Department of Justice pointed in 2007 to…
References
Good to know: Windows on a Mac. (2012). Apple. Retrieved:
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/guide/windows
Lohr, Steve. (1998). Ruling on Microsoft shows a fault line in antitrust theory. The New York
Times. Retrieved: http://www.lexisnexis.com.proxy.devry.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
http://www.lexisnexis.com.proxy.devry.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
Retrieved: http://seattletimes.com/html/microsoft/2003861478_microsoft31.html
ANTITRUST Economics Antitrust practices and market power: Technology, social networking sites, and anti-competitive behavior Q1.Why was/were the firm(s) investigated for antitrust behavior? IBM, AT&T, Microsoft, Intel, Google, Twitter, and Facebook are all technology companies that have been accused of operating as de facto and de jure monopolies: in other words, of engaging in blatant violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act or of substantially limiting market competition to such a degree that a monopoly has been
Antitrust Practice and Market Power Antitrust Practices and Market Power government promulgates antitrust law to prohibit unfair business practices in the United States and enhancing competitions within the U.S. marketplace. Several business practices are considered illegal under the antitrust law and these practices include illegal monopoly, price fixing, illegally discouraging competition, and bid rigging. For example, Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 prohibits monopolizing the interstate commerce, bid rigging, and price fixing. Moreover,
Antitrust Case Background One recent antitrust action has been between the United States Justice Department and the credit card companies. The government has argued that American Express has hindered competition in the credit card market. At issue are rules that AMEX imposes on retailers to prevent them from offering incentives to customers to use other cards (Longstreth, 2014). This is not the first time that credit card companies have faced antitrust action,
Antitrust Practices and Market Power It is important to realize the reason that Microsoft was investigated for possibly violating antitrust laws at the turn of the millennium. The company had established something of a natural monopoly of the software market (which is distinct from a government monopoly), and was leveraging its considerable market power to systematically eliminate its competition. It is legal to establish a monopoly in any given industry; yet
Antitrust Practices and Market Power The modern business environment is increasingly characterized by the proliferation of emerging monopolies in various industries. One of the industries that have experienced an increase in budding monopolies is Information Technology, particularly with the growth and development of social media and networks. Technology companies have rapidly developed into monopolies because of the connection between attractive business opportunities. The growth of leading technology companies into monopolies has
Antitrust and Intellectual Property Antitrust Law Remedies in Intellectual Property Cases In any research paper it is important to first define the terms used prominently in order to make sure that the reader understands what is being said. In this case, the two terms that require definition are antitrust and intellectual property. According to a definition from Cornell University Law School "Trusts and monopolies are concentrations of economic power in the hands